Undergraduate dissertation: Presidential and media framing in the Ukrainian Russian and Palestinian Israeli conflicts: a comparative analysis of Biden, Trump, CNN, and Fox News.
Authorship
R.A.H.
Bachelor of Political Science and Administration
R.A.H.
Bachelor of Political Science and Administration
Defense date
09.03.2025 17:00
09.03.2025 17:00
Summary
This Final Degree project analyzes how the American media outlets CNN and Fox News frame the discourses of Presidents Joe Biden and Donald Trump regarding two major international conflicts: the Russia Ukraine conflict and the Israeli Palestinian conflict. The study is based on the premise that both political leaders and the media play a key role in shaping public narratives about war and peace. Using a mixed methodology ,combining qualitative and quantitative content analysis, the research investigates dominant frames, informational tone, source selection, and possible ideological orientations in the media coverage of presidential decisions. Furthermore, it examines whether the media act as mechanisms of legitimation or questioning of foreign policy, applying the theories of framing, indexing, and manufacturing consent. Despite the ideological differences between Biden and Trump, and between the analyzed media outlets, there is a shared tendency to justify the use of force. CNN and Fox News, although with different approaches, frequently reproduce narratives that legitimize military intervention, often omitting alternative or humanitarian perspectives. The thesis also highlights gaps in the literature: few studies specifically analyze how presidential decisions are framed in the media, and even fewer compare both conflicts and both presidents simultaneously. This research seeks to fill that gap by offering a critical analysis of the relationship between political leadership, media, and public perception of war.
This Final Degree project analyzes how the American media outlets CNN and Fox News frame the discourses of Presidents Joe Biden and Donald Trump regarding two major international conflicts: the Russia Ukraine conflict and the Israeli Palestinian conflict. The study is based on the premise that both political leaders and the media play a key role in shaping public narratives about war and peace. Using a mixed methodology ,combining qualitative and quantitative content analysis, the research investigates dominant frames, informational tone, source selection, and possible ideological orientations in the media coverage of presidential decisions. Furthermore, it examines whether the media act as mechanisms of legitimation or questioning of foreign policy, applying the theories of framing, indexing, and manufacturing consent. Despite the ideological differences between Biden and Trump, and between the analyzed media outlets, there is a shared tendency to justify the use of force. CNN and Fox News, although with different approaches, frequently reproduce narratives that legitimize military intervention, often omitting alternative or humanitarian perspectives. The thesis also highlights gaps in the literature: few studies specifically analyze how presidential decisions are framed in the media, and even fewer compare both conflicts and both presidents simultaneously. This research seeks to fill that gap by offering a critical analysis of the relationship between political leadership, media, and public perception of war.
Direction
LOPEZ LOPEZ, PAULO CARLOS (Tutorships)
LOPEZ LOPEZ, PAULO CARLOS (Tutorships)
Court
GONZALEZ LOPEZ, MANUEL (Chairman)
PINTADO LOBATO, MONTSERRAT (Secretary)
LOPEZ RODRIGUEZ, ALFONSO ANTONIO (Member)
GONZALEZ LOPEZ, MANUEL (Chairman)
PINTADO LOBATO, MONTSERRAT (Secretary)
LOPEZ RODRIGUEZ, ALFONSO ANTONIO (Member)